U.S. Rep. Brad Miller , D- 13th District, counters those fears assume “a tyrannical government.” He said the idea that armed citizens serve as an effective check on a modern military is “kind of a fantasy.”
“Given the power of the military now, the weaponry available to the military and the powers of the government, the idea that armed citizens are an important check on government just seems unrealistic,” Miller said. “And it leads to the kind of carnage that we saw in Aurora.”
And what is it within liberals in general that drive them to entrust inanimate government over real people with their well being? I am sure there is a term that describes such a psychosis. Whatever that psychosis it is surly highly related to the dehumanization of the disarmed victims their arguments necessarily force upon them. While liberals seem prepared to argue for disarming potential victims, I doubt those same individuals would argue for de-clawing cats prior to throwing them to the wild.
What drives liberals like Brad Miller to dehumanize their fellow citizens and treat them as less than cats? What drives them to disconnect from their fellow citizen and embrace inanimate governance?
In the case of Brad Miller, his immorality in such matters are of little significance in terms of his governance, he has lost his gerrymandered district to his extremism. But as a private citizen he will still be able argue for his cold, inhuman, and inhumane liberal immorality and that is his right.