Misleding the world with 'peer review'

Well well, the snow still falls along the Himalayan Mountain chain. We were told by our betters that most Himalayan Glaciers would be gone by 2035. Apparently the claim was based on one man's 'speculation. Peer review? not so much. The real question as to whether the claim was adopted by the IPCC seemed to be, Does this claim fit the narrative?


At other times the IPCC relies not on one scientist's speculation but rather on a 'study' of the effects of global warming on the 'rain forests' (read jungle) by the WWF, an extremist advocacy group. Peer review by who? Not even the like minded.