Why is any of this considered a leak?
But more importantly, why is our government involved with any of this climategate proven nitwittery at all? There is no way an agreement from these talks will result in anything but a limiting of liberty for US citizens. The vary fact that our leaders are involved in these negotiations is evidence that they do not represent the interests of the citizenry.
With that in mind ... withdraw, let the rest of the world agree to cut their own throats while we prosper on the fruits of our liberty.
But no.
Guardian:
Hidden behind the save-the-world rhetoric of the global climate change negotiations lies the mucky realpolitik: money and threats buy political support; spying and cyberwarfare are used to seek out leverage.
Once again the embarrassment is not the leak, but rather our government's willingness to involve itself (with a reliance on the unethical) in an unethical sham, this time the Global Warming nonsense -- a concern of statists and enemies of liberty.
Once again Wikileaks shows us that if our leaders respected liberty these "leaks" would be inconsequential.
out
No comments:
Post a Comment