PolifrogBlog

There is no free in liberty.


.
Showing posts with label NC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NC. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 13, 2012

The Elimination of Property Taxes is not Just for North Dakota -- Try North Carolina...

polifrog




NY Times:

       Since Californians shrank their property taxes more than three decades ago by passing Proposition 13, people around the nation have echoed their dismay over such levies, putting forth plans to even them, simplify them, cap them, slash them. In an election here on Tuesday, residents of North Dakota will consider a measure that reaches far beyond any of that — one that abolishes the property tax entirely. 
...even if the measure here fails on Tuesday, the notion is picking up steam in some Republican circles in other states, including North Carolina, Texas and Pennsylvania.
Property owners in North Carolina are not owners of their property, they are renting it from that jurisdiction which can evict them from their property for not paying their property taxes.

Property owners who can be evicted are not property owners, they are tenants.

Support your right to own your property.



out

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

Conservatives Stand to Gain from Voter ID Laws - 75% In Favor...

polifrog



Under the Dome:

A new Elon University Poll finds that nearly three-quarters of North Carolina residents – not voters – would support some sort of photo identification requirement to vote.

The survey found that only 24 percent opposed the law.


This seems to me to be a no-brainer.  Push the law and conservatives benefit; shut out liberal shenanigans at the polls and conservatives benefit.



out

Monday, March 26, 2012

Hmm, Gingich Cancels NC Stop...

polifrog



robchristensen:

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich's campaign swing to North Carolina on Wednesday has been cancelled, his campaign has confirmed.

[...]


Probably nothing..




out

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

An NC Role in the Primaries?

polifrog



A nice change.

Under The Dome:

The May 8th North Carolina Republican primary depends on the Newt Gingrich factor.
If the former House speaker remains in the race, then Mitt Romney is leading among North Carolina Republicans. But if Gingrich drops out of the race, conservatives rally around Rick Santorum.

That is according to a new survey by Public Policy Polling, a Democratic leaning firm based in Raleigh.
It should come as no surprise, though, that without Newt dividing the vote of the majority of conservatives who are not weak conservative Romney supporters, Santorum comes out ahead.  But it is just as likely that if Santorum were to drop out, Newt would pick up NC.

It is just nice that NC may play a role in the primary process. 

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

It Seems Obama Believes NC is Worth Battling Over...

polifrog



A bit of name dropping going on in the SOTU. Raleigh, Charlotte, CPCC.

Expect to be badgered in the coming year.




out

Friday, January 20, 2012

No Delay for NC Primary...

polifrog



In a turn of good news for NC influence in national matters...

PilotOnline:

A three-judge panel has refused to delay North Carolina's May 8 primary while a court considers a lawsuit over Republican-drawn boundaries for legislative and congressional districts.



out

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Antifrackers Fracturing Prosperity...

polifrog




The Fiscal Times:
...Here’s the story: the EPA says tests it conducted in Pavillion, Wyoming “indicate that ground water in the aquifer contains compounds likely associated with gas production practices, including hydraulic fracturing.” However, it turns out that the EPA drilled two monitoring wells to some 900 feet – much deeper than water wells which are usually at about 300 feet – and indeed found hydrocarbons. In short, they drilled into the natural gas reservoir that has long attracted industry producers. It may the single most productive moment in EPA history.


Antifrackers already know the answers, they just need the "science" to bridge the gap between what we know and those answers. Until then expect endless questions regarding safety, regulation, how this may effect that, and every possible future outcome that does not positively effect our state and nation.

If history has proven anything it is that prosperity is difficult enough to achieve without luddites not only fearing, but actively rejecting that which nourishes prosperity.





out

Sunday, March 27, 2011

A Revolution in Education is Upon Us Via Khan - Flipping...

polifrog



The long awaited revolution in education is upon us.

Perhaps considering the confluence of the facts that 60% of NC's budget is slated for education, the state budget is not only limited but slated for cuts, that there is a need to find greater efficiency within the educational system, and the advent of true intellectual creativity such as Khan's will result in change.

But it brings me to tears that my children will in all likelihood miss such change within their formal educational career considering the glacial pace of our educational system. I suppose it is incumbent upon me to bring to my children what their state will not.

TED:






out

Sunday, October 24, 2010

Brad Miller (NC-13) Bad Economic Solutions During Difficult Times...

polifrog


Brad Miller cosponsored The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (H.R. 5116). According to Brad Miller on his office's congressional website:

“Before this recession, the industries that North Carolinians traditionally relied upon--textiles, tobacco, furniture-- suffered one loss after another,” Miller said. “Now unemployment in North Carolina is more than 14% in some parts. Most of those traditional jobs are not coming back. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that new jobs are going to come from science and research. New jobs are created by the development and adoption of new technologies and America must be leading the way.”

“Plain and simple, this bill will create jobs. It provides loans to allow small and mid-size businesses to keep their current employees and hire more. The Research Triangle Park, a leader in advanced energy, will greatly benefit from provisions that will create regional economies around existing areas of expertise, or innovation hubs,” Miller added.


Can it truly be argued that removing money from American investors and savers, funneling those dollars through the grinding inefficiencies of governance only put what remains in the hands of industries that owe their existence to government is a strength for America?

No! This is not how America became great.


This, though, is what Brad Miller argues, against history, in his cosponsoring of H.R. 5116.


Because Brad Miller brought up NC's history in textiles, tobacco, and furniture a little history is in order. The supposition inherent in Brad Miller's comments is that NC had a strong economy through most of the 20th century due to it's reliance on textiles, tobacco, and furniture and to regain that economic strength we need government investment to seed new growth in new areas. The idea that this is a path to economic strength is wrong headed.

NC's historical reliance on textiles, tobacco, and furniture did not stem from government seed money as Brad Miller seems to suggest, but rather private investor seed money. NC's strength in these areas was a result of individual and private investment and in the case of tobacco, fortunate climactic positioning.

An underrated but more important factor in NC's strength was the fact that it was one state of many in a successful country and this web of states have been able to efficiently support one another economically through the magic of the "invisible hand" and free trade.

In pointing to the success of NC in the 20th century as support for his form of Crony Capitalism, Brad Miller besmirches all NC individuals who had an actual hand in NC's economic strength during that period of NC's history.

Brad Miller's support for H.R. 5116 also indicates his support for policies that threaten to lead America toward a more Mercantilistic economy, more commonly called Crony Capitalism today. American capitalism has already crushed Mercantilism once and Brad Miller's desire to install it as a fixture in American governance speaks to his lack of education. Crony Capitalism weakens America just as it weakened, and continues to weaken Europe. Brad Miller does not seem to understand that if America is weakened NC is weakened as well.

Brad Miller is an embarrassment to economic thought, an embarrassment to America, an embarrassment NC and he should be an embarrassment to himself.






out

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Brad Miller's Indentured Servitude Of Individuals, Of States, and Of Our Nation....

polifrog


Update:
Polifrog apologizes for prematurely posting the following as a rough draft. Accidents happen.


The cast system of perpetual government assistance created by liberal logic didn't stop with classes of individuals enticed toward a cycle of poverty. Currently it is metastasizing into a similar system of state indentured servitude to the federal government in part due to North Carolina's growing debt and dependency on federal assistance due to that debt.

NC has, to a large degree, become a dependent state due to our state's Pavlov like votes for Brad Miller, a politician who pushes bills through congress that "help" states that spend more than they take in. This "help" does not serve the long term interests of the states, though. A state, like an individual or spoiled child, will never learn fiscal discipline if the negative results of their profligate sending is never felt. This liberal feel good legislation dooms these states to more spending and dependency on the federal government for new rounds of bailouts. Of course, with dependency comes federal manipulation of state affairs and further dissolution of our federal system. Texas recently gave the federal government the bird due to these polices. Good for Texas. NC's delegation of panty-wastes leaders could never muster the strength to do the same.

Not only does Brad Miller put today's citizens further into debt, but he supports legislation that creates debt in perpetuity for generations to come. Brad Miller put 1/6 of NC' s economy under federal control and is forcing the unborn generations who survive Miller's abortion killing fields to foot the our bills for those who don't make it to birth. The results of this combination of excessive government spending combined with a scourge of abortions can be witnessed today in a Europe that has grown dependent on culturally insensitive Muslim immigration to keep their populations from collapsing. The Europe we know today, the source of western civilization, is dying due to liberal ideology.

It is not just Brad Miller that supports NC dependency. NC has become an indentured state by giving its support to Bev Perdue as well, a politician who gladly accepts federal funding. These handouts are often required to be used on new spending only. This creates a new baseline for next year's spending when there is no federal handout. This further pushes NC toward insolvency and dependency by growing next year's budget with this year's spending. Brad Miller helps with the creation and passage of such bills in congress and Bev Perdue gladly signs our state into Brad Miller supported indentured servitude to the federal government. According to LincolnTibune:

The implications of the 2010-11 state budget will be felt heavily next year. By relying on more than $1.5 billion of non-recurring federal stimulus funds and $1.3 billion in temporary tax revenue to help balance the 2010-11 budget, North Carolina lawmakers and Gov. Perdue are setting up North Carolina for a major state budgetary crisis in 2011-12. Absent those two significant sources of funding, state budget writers will be facing a revenue hole of $2.8 billion when they reconvene next year to craft the 2011-12 state budget.


The national implication of this liberal reliance on dependency and debt can seen starkly on the graphs below. Obama supporting states have twice the debt per capita debt than the non Obama voting states.

According to Moody’s, the average state per capita debt of the 28 Obama states is $1,728 while the average debt in the 22 McCain states is less than half, at $749. This information alone says a lot about voters and their attitude towards government and debt. Voters with a propensity to elect politicians who burden future generations who can’t yet vote with huge debts voted for Obama while fiscally responsible voters generally voted for McCain.



Although states can turn to the Federal Government for relief, our national government has only nations outside our boarders to support its debt. This national reliance on debt to fund government growth increases our dependence on unreliable international sources and calls into question our future as a nation. Brad Miller, Bev Perdue and other of their ilk are forcing unborn generations of Americans who survive the gauntlet of Brad Miller's Congressional supported abortions into a nation with a questionable future.



[edited for clarity]
out

Thursday, August 5, 2010

Rep. Brad Miller -- On Secrecy Within Governance and Duplicitous Intent...

polifrog


In an interesting turn Rep. Brad Miller of NC. penned a letter to the editor of the Washington Post in which he stands apart from President Obama.

President Obama recently threatened to veto the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act because it requires intelligence agencies to allow the Government Accountability Office (GAO), an arm of Congress, access for audits and investigations. The GAO has the resources and expertise needed for effective oversight and knows how to keep secrets.

The president should welcome another set of eyes on the intelligence community.

Polifrog found this public move against the leader of the Democrat party by Brad Miller interesting considering Brad Miller's vote for the recent Financial Regulation Bill in which he supported excluding the SEC from public disclosure.

Under a little-noticed provision of the recently passed financial-reform legislation, the Securities and Exchange Commission no longer has to comply with virtually all requests for information releases from the public, including those filed under the Freedom of Information Act.

On one hand, in the case of the GAO oversight of intelligence agency operations, Brad Miller feels the disclosure of information for the public good is a positive direction for our nation, yet on the other hand Brad Miller supported secrecy for the SEC, an agency intimately involved with reacting to current economic malaise.

Why the duplicity? Why the sudden interest in access to information and openness?

In search of an answer to the question Polifrog leafed through the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act (HR-5136) for an answer. Of course, the answer has nothing to do with Brad Miller's new found penchant for openness.

In section 316 of the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act Polifrog found this noble election year carve out for Brad Miller.

By not later than 180 days after the date of the
6 enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall provide
7 the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
8 with an electronic inventory of all existing documents,
9 records, and electronic data pertaining to the CERCLA
10 listed and RCRA listed contamination sites at Camp
11 Lejeune and all existing documents, records, and electronic
12 data pertaining to the contaminated drinking water
13 at Camp Lejeune.

This is Brad Miller's true agenda. The issue of the contaminated sites in Camp Lejeune and the effects this contamination has had on Marine veterans and their families has been a pet cause for Brad Miller. It is, as suggested earlier, noble, but it was not the reason stated in the Washington Post letter to the editor for Brad Miller's objection to Obama's possible veto of HR-5136. In that letter to the editor Brad Miller objected to a possible Obama veto of HR-5136 on the grounds that "the president should welcome another set of eyes on the intelligence community."

Why couldn't Brad Miller have just argued for the truth? It is a noble truth and one he should be proud of. Instead, Brad Miller chose duplicity in an attempt to cover for his earlier support for secrecy by letting the SEC off the hook in Freedom of Information Act requests.

Brad Miller supports secrecy within government where it counts...his vote, letters to the editor aside.

Brad Miller, Not your parent's Democrat.






out

Saturday, July 24, 2010

Rep. Brad Miller, the Silent Incumbent Candidate...A Polifrog Call to Bloggers to Stand Athwart Brad Miller's Silence and Rattle the Cage

polifrog


Congressman Brad Miller's silence as an incumbent candidate is stunning.

Polifrog was directed to this piece at Carolina Journal via Google-Alerts, as it has been one of the few alerts over the past month that has mentioned Brad Miller the congressman and not Brad Miller the basketball player. In questioning multiple NC candidates on the expiring "Bush tax cuts" Carolina Journal tuck this response from Brad Miller at the end its article.

"Rep. Brad Miller, a Democrat who was elected in 2002, did not respond."
It seems all those candidates -- all democrats -- who chose not to respond should have had their response printed at forefront of the article. Shameful.

Brad Miller's silence is epic and promoted by a lazy local press. Google-news captures Brad Miller's name only 25 times for the past month under congressman "Brad Miller", four hits of which are of the athlete Brad Miller who it seems is now playing for the Rockets and a single reference to another Brad Miller who plays base ball. That leaves 20 hits referencing Congressman Brad Miller of NC. Of those 20, two simply mention Brad Miller in a list. What does this say of our press? Will they print nothing that isn't first passed on to them from Brad Miller? Do they do no research with their often vaunted research tools of there own? It certainly seems they are little more than Brad Miller's megaphone to the people.

What of the blogs? The same search for Congressman "Brad Miller" under a Google-blog search for the past month yielded 529 hits. This was narrowed down to 72 results by searching "Rep Brad Miller". Although these numbers seem high compared with the "news" category of hits, these numbers are shamefully low. Polifrog has unfortunately played a roll in this silence on Brad Miller. Polifrog has found it easy to wait for Brad Miller to speak and only then to reply. For this Polifrog apologizes.

As an incumbent Congressman Brad Miller's silence will propel him to an easy victory against Bill Randall this November. There is little that Brad Miller can point to in the past two years as proof of his positive stewardship of North Carolina. Instead, Brad Miller's record of voting in the Senate stands in contrast to North Carolina morals and in particular, the morals of district 13. Polifrog believes our liberal press knows this and is clearly standing with Brad Miller's chosen course of silence.

Polifrog calls to all bloggers with such an interest to not rest on their laurels as Polifrog has done in recent weeks -- waiting for Google Alerts -- and, instead, look for those stories our local press refuses to cover in their bid to give Brad Miller the silence he desires. It is up to the bloggers of NC to do the job of the press, to raise the questions they refuse to raise, to bring up Brad Miller's past voting record, to expose him as the extreme liberal with no respect for founding principles that he is, and attempt to inform our public that Brad Miller is not their parent's Democrat.

Brad Miller, not your parent's Democrat.





out

Monday, July 12, 2010

NC. HB 748 -- A NC Attempt to Squelch Free Speech via Blogs, Twitter, Facebook

polifrog


Polifrog has been slow picking up on this bill and is still researching it but the fact that this has been under consideration is an indication that all our lawmakers should be replaced.

Via Daren Bakst...
The NC legislature is considering a bill (HB 748) tonight that could force many people communicating through the Internet and mentioning a political candidate to file reports with the state.

This means a blog that does regular political analysis could be forced to send in reports to the state.

Almost any web site that just mentions a political candidate in any context could be forced to file reports.

The law specifically exempts print and broadcast media from this reporting requirement, but picks on the "new media."
NC. House Bill 748.


Update:
Meet the primary sponsors of HB 748.

Deborah Ross (D)
Paul Stam (R)
Jennifer Weiss (D)
Nelson Dollar (R)

These four representatives and any that cosponsored or supported this bill with their vote should loose their position regardless of party affiliation. Conservatives in particular should go for their blatant attempt to squelch individual free speech.




out

Monday, June 21, 2010

(NC-13) Runoff Prediction - Bill Randall , Bernie Reeves

polifrog


Bill Randall and Bernie Reeves have been pitted against one another due to NC election rules that trigger a runoff between the top two vote receivers if no candidate clears the required 40% minimum.

There have been two debates. One attended by the public and one televised. Both were reviewed by Polifrog here and here. The first was quite cordial while the second was significantly more contentious due to Reeves' series of attacks, a tactic the Reeves Campaign began to employ after the first debate. As a result the past month has seen a series of fair criticisms punctuated by character attacks on Bill Randall by Bernie Reeves. In both debates Reeves showed either flashes of anger (to guffaws in the crowd) or moments of clear frustration.

By contrast, there have been no attacks on Reeves by Randall and no anger or frustration expressed by Randall. Polifrog, though, has become concerned with Randall's over reliance on pat, seemingly memorized answers to questions, while at the same time often stumbling through answers to questions that are outside the normal pap candidates endure. A perfect example of this was Randall's recent flap over what the press characterized as an accusation of collusion between BP and the Government to cause the Gulf oil spill. Of course, Randall made no such accusation. His fumbling through his answer, though, allowed for an easy twisting of his words into something he did not intend.

Reeves has many traditional strengths. Money (as compared to Randall), old establishment experience in Carter Wrenn, and what Polifrog believes is an often overlooked support in the local press due to Reeves' long history as a part of the journalism business in Raleigh. This strength was best employed by Biesecker in his spin on the Randall BP/Government collusion statements as pointed out by Polifrog here.

Randall's strengths are fewer but perhaps more influential. He seems to have the excitement of the people at his back. Polifrog has watched this excitement daily through google alerts which admittedly became biased after Randall's BP statements, but prior to which Randall dominated in terms of hits. Not only does he have the excitement of the people, but he has history at his back as well. It seems a new type of republican is sweeping into office due to the disappointment that was the republican congress during the Bush years and the shock of the Obama agenda. Reeves seems, fairly or unfairly, tied to that disappointing congress under Bush while Randall has successfully tied himself to the energized Tea Party movement.

For these reasons Polifrog calls it, and not without reservation, for Bill Randall.


Related posts by Polifrog




out

Friday, June 11, 2010

Bernie Reeves and the Press -- The Only Conclusion is Collusion:

 polifrog



While researching  Carter Wrenn and Bernie Reeves Disrespecting Privacy: MBA Polifrog noted that the newsoberver.com (blog) post on Randall's MBA was posted only 2 hours after Carter Wrenn broke the story and had a surprising amount of researched information considering the late hour. Polifrog set it aside as it was not germane to post at the time.


This post intends to carry that neglected observation forward.

In a previous post Bernie Reeves and His Fickle Friends in the Press  Polifrog asserted that Bernie Reeves holds an advantage in the press over Bill Randall.  Some have questioned,though, Polifrog's claim that such an advantage exists as no concrete link was provided.

Although, it seems an obvious assumption such links exist,  as:

Networking, making friends, owing favors and having favors owed in return are all steps in a dance when doing business and  Reeves has been a part of that dance for quite some time.

demonstrable proof is of a higher threshold and Polifrog believes it should be met.

Proof of this connection can be found in the Bernie Reeves/Bill Randall MBA drama of the last couple of days in which Bernie Reeves accused Bill Randall of falsely claiming an MBA.

The first publication of this accusation seems to be Carter Wrenn's Does He Or Doesn't He? at  8:03PM Wednesday.  One would think that this sort of information would have been  broken on the Bernie Reeves campaign website.  It was not; the Bernie Reeves campaign website references Wrenn's attack on Bill Randall and not the other way around. Carter Wrenn posted  the attack at both talkingpolitics.com and at The Reeves Campaign website.


The next publication of the Randall MBA attack came just 2 hours later at 10:04PM Wednesday at the NewsObsever.com (blogs) and was penned by mbieseck.   The same piece was then officially published again seven hours later by Staff Writer Michael Biesecker at  newsobserver.com 4:57AM Thursday Morning, presumably the same person.

According to Biesecker:
Wednesday evening, Reeves' campaign provided a copy of e-mailed reply from the clearinghouse saying that Randall had been enrolled at National-Louis, which offers courses over the Internet, from 2004 to 2006, but that he did not earn a degree.
...
Reached by a reporter, Randall said any suggestion he did not earn an MBA is "ridiculous."
...
A spokeswoman for National-Louis reached by Dome late Wednesday said she could not immediately confirm whether or not Randall earned a degree at the institution. She said a definitive check of the university's records would be completed Thursday.

Are we to believe that in the two hours (8PM to 10PM) between Carter Wrenn's attack on Randall and the newsobserver.com Biesecker piece that a newsobserver.com reporter contacted Bill Randall and a National-Louis  spokesman?  At that late hour? Mind you,  school administration officials or people of authority are unlikely to work past 5:00 and with the timezone changes taken into account, the latest National-Louis University could likely  have been contacted by the reporter was 6:00pm eastern time.  That would have been  2 hours prior to Carter Wrenn's breaking of the Randall MBA story via talkingpolitics.com.


Unless Biesecker is prescient, how did he know to call National-Louis University prior to Wrenn's  Randall MBA attack?


Could it be that the only conclusion is collusion,  that the newsobserver.com and the Bernie Reeves campaign conspired to attack Bill Randall by sharing information prior to the  publishing  of multiple articles in the late hours of Wednesday and the small hours of Thursday  in an effort to increase the effectiveness of the attack?


It certainly seems likely.

The posting of essentially the same article twice in the newsoberver.com under different locations within the site, once at talkingpolitics.com, and once at the Bernie Reeves Campaign website undoubtedly makes an impression on google and would clearly spread the word more effectively true or not.

Polifrog hopes to be proven wrong and be able to write  as Bernie Reeves recently wrote in reference to his failed Randall MBA attack:
...it was a fair question...
[Added] Consider the influence of a man willing to collude with the power of media. Then imagine the governance of the same man as a seated congressman able to collude with government. 

As an aside, Polifrog called National-Lewis University this afternoon during the 4:00 hour to experience their policy toward questions posed to the University.  The University's policy is not to answer questions verbally and required Polifrog to submit the question via e-mail, presumably for clarity and to have a written record.  This is time consuming, and as of the 9:00 hour Polifrog has yet to receive a reply. 


Edited for clarity.
out

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Bernie Reeves and His Fickle Friends in the Press...

polifrog

 Earlier in NC-13 - Bernie Reeves' Friends in the Press Have His Back...Dump on Bill Randall Polifrog  wrote:


It must be nice being Bernie Reeves, an inside-the-beltway politician steered by old timers like Carter Wrenn. I suppose it is made all the sweeter when you've had decades to make the media connections only a local media mogul can, connections that are willing to support your political interests when the time is right. Heck, it might make Reeves feel a little like a liberal with the press at his back, but that is an argument for another time.

I thought I would explore the thought that Bernie Reeves has the press at his back and how that might affect him in the general election.

I believe it is intuitive that a man who,

...started the Spectator, Metro Magazine, The Triangle Business Journal and the Raleigh Spy Conference,...


has spent much of his time with his peers in the press.  Networking, making friends, owing favors and having favors owed in return are all steps in a dance when doing business and  Reeves has been a part of that dance for quite some time. This gives Reeves an edge in the primary, but unfortunately Reeves is relying on that edge to the point of overconfidence.

Reeves has, in both debates, either revealed flashes of anger or thinly veiled frustration.  Some see this as an example of a bloated ego or  arrogance, but I tend to believe that arrogance can be earned and  Reeves, with his success in business, has more than earned the right to be arrogant from time to time. No, I believe Reeves' flashes of anger and frustration speak to something more problematic.

Reeves is press savvy,  shrewd, and has cornucopia of knowledge from which to draw.  He  should know well what the press does to conservative politicians  who let anger slip through the lenses of a camera.  Such emotions from conservatives do not get labeled as godly passion by the press. Conservatives are, instead, vilified for expressing anger, yet there he is at the first debate defiantly  looking down a press camera with anger!  What is it in him that would allow that?

The answer is that Reeves finds too much comfort in his business friends in the press. Although, they are currently willing to look the other way when reporting on Reeves' debate performances against Randall, the press is fickle and the connections Reeves seems to be currently relying on to protect him from himself will likely be overlooked in a debate with Brad Miller.

This is my fear: that  Reeves has grown too dependant on a friendly press during the primary and, as a result, has become emotionally gaffe prone.  In the general, Reeves' once accommodating press friends will savage him over those gaffes in an effort to protect Miller.

In the end Reeves is not a liberal, will not have the press at his back and as a result his loose cannon personality will make him a weaker candidate in the general election than Bill Randall. Unfortunately, I am not convinced Reeves has  the ability to gain control over his frustrations and even if he were get that control, I doubt he has time enough to rework his image.




out

Sunday, June 6, 2010

NC-13 - Bernie Reeves' Friends in the Press Have His Back...Dump on Bill Randall

polifrog



It must be nice being Bernie Reeves, an inside-the-beltway politician steered by old timers like Carter Wrenn. I suppose it is made all the sweeter when you've had decades to make the media connections only a local media mogul can, connections that are willing to support your political interests when the time is right. Heck, it might make Reeves feel a little like a liberal with the press at his back, but that is an argument for another time.

The News & Observer article, Who will Battle Brad Miller? Has already popped up here and here. It will undoubtedly continue making the rounds with Dennis Berwyn's help as it unsurprisingly casts Reeves in a flattering light.

The article begins:
For those of us who get tired of poll-driven empty rhetoric, the idea of two smart, quick-witted, irreverent Raleigh boys ideologically jousting this fall sounded like high political entertainment.

But it is by no means certain that Bernie Reeves, the editor of Metro Magazine and conservative columnist, will get a chance to challenge 13th District Democratic Rep. Brad Miller in November. Reeves is in a tough Republican primary runoff with Bill Randall, a retired Navy command master chief from Wake Forest, who has been active in the tea party movement.

Apparently the author believes only Reeves is "smart, quick-witted, irreverent" as, according to the author, all those qualities are in jeopardy due to the surprising success of Bill Randall. What a shame, the success of a Tea Partier is apparently not story enough or exciting enough for Christensen.

The author continues with this glowing description of Bernie Reeves:

Reeves is the inside-the-Beltline candidate who is a Raleigh fixture. He started the Spectator, Metro Magazine, The Triangle Business Journal and the Raleigh Spy Conference, and has been denouncing creeping socialism for as long as most of us can remember.
He has the backing of much of the old Jesse Helms crowd, including such key strategists as Tom Ellis and Carter Wrenn.

While still in campaign mode for Reeves, all the author can muster for Randall's bio is:

Randall, a native of New Orleans, is outside the Beltline, representing the new wave of suburban voters who make up a significant portion of the Republican Party.

and in the next paragraph refers to Randall as "some newbie". Note the terms "some newbie" were not in quotes in the article, so the terms were used at the author's discretion. Also note, this description of Randall is nearly the same attack made repeatedly by Reeves on Randall in the last debate.

Christensen even went on to quote Reeves with the longest quote of the article which was not surprisingly the same attack on Randall again.

"When I talk about the people who live here, it's because I know them," Reeves said. "You've lived here 18 months. What right do you have to make pronouncements about the mores and activities if you don't know the history, you don't know the culture, you don't know the businesses? You might know the geography from your travels. That's the extent of it."

Of course, even though he was rightfully accused of being patronizing, there was no mention of Reeves' thinly veiled anger during the moment of the quote. Friends in the press have a way of omitting such unpleasantness when  they find it in their interest.

With all manor of tools available to him as a journalist, the only quote Christensen could find for Randall that fit the space he was willing to give was:

"I believe we need to go away from politics as usual," Randall said.
Well, I believe we need to go away from journalism as usual and you can quote Polifrog on that!




out

(NC-13) Brad Miller Has a Vision for Health-Care...

 polifrog



It is a vision in which the recipients of health-care become a cost and government becomes the customer, a system in which the health-care industry grovels at the feet of the source of its funding - bureaucrats, while the infirmed wait in line for the chance to beg for the health-care they paid recalcitrant bureaucrats for.

Brad Miller's vision of better health-care inserts himself between my doctor and myself through insurance companies.

Eventually, though, the nation will question the existence of the insurance companies and the end result will be the NHS, England's government health-care. Via dailymail.com:

Earlier this year the Government's rationing body said more cuts in medical treatments are planned to save the NHS at least £600million.

Patients could find it harder to get into hospital under plans from the National Institute for health and Clinical Excellence, which advises on drugs and procedures to be funded.
Brad Miller's vision for Health-Care in the US is to fully break the bond between health-care customer and health-care provider, so that he, governance embodied, will be the one the infirmed come to when in need. He has no medical degree, has taken no Hippocratic oath, yet his governance will be the source of our health-care.

Imagine our need, imagine Brad Miller's influence...

Health-care has to be paid for out of our pockets. Either it goes directly from our pockets to the health-care industry, or it goes in to the hands of governance then to the health-care industry. The question is...is it more efficient for us to give our dollars directly to those who wish to provide us with a service and retain the power we have as a customer over a provider,  than to give those dollars and influence to Brad Miller, and be left  groveling at his feet when we fear services may be cut.

Brad Miller's vision for health-care increases Brad Miller's influence while decreasing ours, it strengthens government  while weakening America.  Under Brad Miller's vision Europe's socialist failure will be ours.




out

Friday, June 4, 2010

(NC-13) Debate 2 - Bernie Reeves Vs. Bill Randall - More Impressions

polifrog
Previous comments on this debate are here.



Some observations only come with time...

Debates between politicians are nothing like debate club debates.  They are scored entirely different.  School debates are decided on facts, knowledge and points scored while debates between politicians rely more heavily on impressions.  Bernie Reeves appears to be unaware of this.


Bernie Reeves has an admirable  ability to effortlessly pull information from the recesses of his mind. I  envy him for it, as I don't have the ability myself, and further, I find myself at a total loss in impromptu situations.  He is at home in those situations and thus has an undeniable edge going into any debate.  Why,  then, did he go on to loose this debate?

I believe the answer is multi layered.

It begins with a trait that appears to be a strength initially, but in the hands  of Reeves' works to his detriment.  That trait is his seemingly unlimited  well of knowledge.  In nearly every answer to almost all questions posed Reeves has a wealth of facts and history that he can not help but put on  parade. Perhaps more accurately, he can't help but put himself on parade.  Unfortunately, there are no short answers for Reeves. 

The result is that he often looses himself in the eddies of his learning as he winds his way through his answers.  He does not seem to know how to pare  his answers down to....answers.  Coherent understandable answers are the root of a win.  When Reeves looses himself, he looses his audience.

In the end, attendees are treated to a stampede of facts and history that attempt to answer the question, but in the end only hide Reeves' answers (which are there) in a needless cloud of knowledge.

I imagine it is frustrating to Reeves to  loose to  Randall, a man who debates in short memorized answers.  Unfortunately, from that frustration is born Reeves' irritation with Randall's  sometimes pithy answers.  Pithy answers have their place, though, as they get to the point with a thud and voters like that.

Memorized answers or, at least, some debate preparation  would give much need structure to Reeves' free wheeling impromptu debating style and lend Reeves some control over the lasting impression of the debate.







out