PolifrogBlog

There is no free in liberty.


.
Showing posts with label Bev Perdue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bev Perdue. Show all posts

Saturday, June 16, 2012

Rep. Brad Miller (NC-13) - Praises Coattails Perdue...

polifrog


Brad Miller had this to say of Bev Perdue:

Under the Dome:


"I wish every Democrat in the nation was as tough as Bev Perdue."

It is good that Brad Miller too is on the way out of power.  Any man who says Perdue is tough is a man who has lost touch with reality.

Bev Perdue came to the governorship with the help of Obama's popularity but upon recognizing his waning popularity, and her own as well, chose not to run again.

In on coattails; out without.
No backbone.






out

Saturday, March 17, 2012

The Anti-Fracking Canard is Dead....

polifrog



Beaufort Observer:
A reliable source within the Governor's office tells us that the Governor was told by DENR sometime ago that the report was accumulating substantial scientific data that would lead to a conclusion that fracking not only can be done safely but that it holds significant economic potential for the state. Knowing that Perdue's position had been the opposite we are told DENR gave her advance notice and in effect sought clearance to release the report which would have been contrary to her position.

We are told that the evidence is so overwhelming that if Perdue stuck to her position that the report would be a major contradiction of her position. So they had two choices: Either DENR could try to kill the report, somehow; or Perdue could change her position.

[...]

Moreover, another source tells us that the first source was probably correct but that another factor came into play. It is believed that the Obama Administration is on the verge of announcing a reversal of their position on natural gas exploration, not only from fracking but also in offshore drilling. "The DOE (Department of Energy) has already sent the message that if gasoline prices continue to climb that they will change their position on fracking."

Democrat politics and economic damage go hand in in.

I would add that her flip-flop paves the way for those Democrats currently running to do so as well without accruing the same political damage they otherwise would have.




out

Thursday, March 15, 2012

NC Democrats Fracked Themselves ...

polifrog



Under the Dome:

Gov. Bev Perdue's move Wednesday toward fracking is putting the Democratic candidates vying to replace her on the spot.

Lt. Gov. Walter Dalton's campaign issued a statement Thursday trying to take a middle-of-the road approach. Dalton supports fracking but suggests it needs more study before moving forward to know if it can be done safely.

"There may be great benefits to and lots of jobs created from fracking, but it is unwise to rush into a decision until all the facts are reviewed," spokesman Pearse Edwards said. "For example, we need to thoroughly assess the risks that fracking may cause to our drinking water, ensure that proper regulations are in place, and determine whether exploration is economically viable. We must also hear from the people of North Carolina. The Lieutenant Governor is hopeful that working together we can find the safest way tap our state’s natural gas reserves and bring much needed jobs to the state."

Bob Etheridge's campaign initially declined to comment but issued a statement Thursday taking a similar approach supporting fracking if the water supply is protected. "We should

Fighting energy availability, which at base is what Democrats have been doing, really has no place in intelligent discussion, much less public policy.

This anti fracking nonsense was a stupid move during a depression. Now it has been made doubly stupid due to the rise in fuel prices caused by the Federal Reserve.

Enjoy watching the Dems dance.





out

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

Good News on the Fracking Front From ... Bev Perdue?

polifrog




Under the Dome:

Jon Romano, the governor's communications director, said Perdue's trip to Pennsylvania convinced her that fracking is possible in North Carolina. "She believes based on what she saw that it can be done safely," he said.


Some liberals seem to have a modicum of sense. Good for North Carolina.




out

Monday, March 12, 2012

Bev Perdue (D) Ignores the Override of Her Veto of the NC Budget With an Executive Order...

polifrog





Phil Berger (R):

What Perdue has done is “completely contrary to a budget that was passed, was adopted according to law and that she has a constitutional obligation to carry out,” said Senate leader Phil Berger, R-Rockingham, adding she’s “acting in a way that I don’t believe a governor of North Carolina ever in the past would have contemplated acting.”

Legislation by way of executive order...





out

Monday, December 19, 2011

Bev Perdue's - BLS BS...

polifrog




People play the market with this sort of info, and if investment "coincidences" come to light...


Carolina Journal:

Since as early as January 2011, and perhaps before then, Gov. Bev Perdue’s press office has received access to confidential employment data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics hours if not days before its scheduled release, quite likely in violation of federal law. The governor’s staff used its early access to massage the monthly employment press release that reported jobs data to the public.

...


This is no small matter: A conviction for breaching the Confidential Information Protection and Statistical Efficiency Act of 2002 carries a fine of up to $250,000, up to five years in prison, or both.

...

“BLS does not support the release of employment and unemployment data before the established dates and times,” said Janet Rankin, BLS regional commissioner for the southeast office in Atlanta in an email.

...
CJ initially suspected Perdue was receiving employment information that was under embargo in August, when she discussed information in the jobs report at a meeting of the Rotary Club of Asheville the day before the data were released to the public.
  
Obama dragged a lot of crap in with those coattails of his. 








out

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

I Really Hope That Someone Can Agree with Me That Democrat NC Gov. Bev Perdue Should Not Have Said This:

polifrog


“I think we ought to suspend, perhaps, elections for Congress for two years and just tell them we won’t hold it against them, whatever decisions they make, to just let them help this country recover,” Perdue said at a rotary club event in Cary, North Carolina, according to the Raleigh News & Observer. “I really hope that someone can agree with me on that.”



out

Wednesday, June 15, 2011

Perdue Veto of NC Budget Overridden...

polifrog


Via WBT:

The North Carolina House has voted to cancel out Democratic Gov. Beverly Perdue's veto of the two-year state budget.

The vote Wednesday just after midnight was 73-46. That's just enough to meet the three-fifths majority required to override a veto.


The NC Senate does not need democrat help to override a veto.

No link yet.


out

Monday, June 13, 2011

2 of 4 Dems Needed to Override Perdue Veto Will Vote to Override...

polifrog



Fayetteville Observer:

Two Cape Fear region lawmakers who are key figures in the state budget battle say they will vote to override Gov. Bev Perdue's budget veto.

Rep. William Brisson and Rep. Dewey Hill are among the five Democrats in the House who voted for the budget. Four are needed to override the veto.


I doubt Perdue would have vetoed the budget without assurances that she had the votes to block an override of her veto but there is the chance that she sees no political harm in having her veto overridden if she makes gains in solidifying her base.

William D. Brisson - 919-733-5772 - william.brisson@ncleg.net
Dewey L. Hill - 919-733-5830 - dewey.hill@ncleg.net

Two Dems still needed....

James W. Crawford - 919-733-5824 - jim.crawford@ncleg.net
Bill Owens - 919-733-0010 - bill.owens@ncleg.net
Timothy L. Spear - 919-715-3029 - tim.spear@ncleg.net



out

Monday, March 28, 2011

Bev Perdue Kicking it Local ...

polifrog



Via BlueRidgeNow:
Studying Gov. Bev Perdue's proposed budget cuts has Gary Pace of Saluda sensing the smell of fear. “The state is trying to put it all back to the counties to pay for things, and you know what that means. It's going to fall back on property owners,” he says. “Homeowners, especially senior citizens, can't bear much more. When you get to a point you can't work much, it's even harder to make ends meet. You have the same bills, but your income doesn't get any better. What needs to be studied is the size of government. It's way too big and costing us dearly.”


I would like to mention to Gary Pace of Saluda that when state funded initiatives are kicked down to the local level the perception of the funding changes from a continuing expense that may be difficult to cut at the state level to a new expense that will require new funding at the local level. It is likely this dynamic would result in the smaller government he seeks in those localities not willing to absorb the new costs.

Considering the party Perdue represents this course of action seems odd.




out

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Bev Perdue's Poor Polling...

polifrog


And that is according to liberal leaning PPP.

Fayobserver,

If the governor election were held today, neither Gov. Bev Perdue nor three other top-level Democrats could beat former Charlotte Mayor Pat McCrory, Democratic pollster Public Policy Polling said today.

...
In potential matchups with the former Charlotte mayor, PPP’s numbers:
-- Perdue 36 percent, McCrory 50 percent
-- Blue 28 percent, McCrory 48 percent
-- Cooper 35 percent, McCrory 43 percent
-- Dalton 27 percent, McCrory 47 percent

This is unsurprising considering the fact that she helped to force ObamaCare on North Carolinians with her veto.

According to State Republican Party was Chaiman Robyn Hayes:
“Big government Democrats in the Tar Heel State have become so toxic that even the Democrat pollsters can’t slant numbers favorably for Governor Perdue and her liberal allies,” he said in a written statement. “This poll is proof that the people of North Carolina overwhelmingly object to the big government, big spending policies of Governor Perdue and her liberal allies and are ready to take their state back.”



out

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Gov. Perdue and NC's Jobs-Making Machine....

polifrog


NC has a state sponsored jobs-making machine?

Governor Bev Perdue has come to Charlotte many times since the economy soured to make jobs announcements, presenting new companies to the community like gifts.

But those companies also get gifts to come here, and now the Republican-controlled Senate wants to take away Perdue's incentive money in order to fill a $3.7 billion budget hole.

...

Perdue's camp says doing so will kill the state's job-making machine, sending companies to other areas.


Of course! It helps hide the deleterious impacts of high taxes and abusive behaviour toward corporations such as theft from Alcoa.

Beating current corporations about the head with one hand while drawing in new corporations with sweeteners the other only serves to drive away the best corporations looking for a long term home.

A friendly environment for corporations with in NC would be easier, cheaper simpler and lead to a more prosperous NC.

Sadly, it would also mean Bev Perdue would be harder pressed to make the claim that she brought jobs to NC.




out

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Fools Debating Spending Cuts or Increased Taxes in an Overtaxed and Over Spending Climate...

polifrog


Via journalnow.com:


Will [Bev Perdue] agree with Republican preferences to cut $3 billion to $4 billion, casting an eye back on November's elections and the big GOP victory? Her political strategy in that case would be to curry favor with conservative voters in anticipation of a re-election run in 2012.

Or will she propose to cut less, demanding that schools and other human services be protected by extending expiring taxes or by raising other taxes and fees? This course would be chosen to shore up her support with Democratic voters, making a "last stand" fight for preserving educational and social-service programs established over the past several decades.



It should be noted that education already eats up 60% of NC's budget. Taking 60% of the budget (education) plus the cost of the unspecified "human resources" would leave less than 40% from which to cut.

Furthermore, it should be noted that the percentage of the NC budget devoted to education would rise if spending in the remaining areas is reduced.

This could easily result in our state spending 70 to 80% of its budget on education. When last year it had been considered fair to spend 60% of the NC budget on education, how is it fair to spend 70 to 80 percent the next year at the cost of other programs?

Truly, the only fair and workable solution would be cuts that hit each recipient of state funds equally so that all recipients of state funding share the burden of the cuts equally.

No cows, sacred or otherwise.




out

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Gov. Bev Perdue - Bogarting Mad Job Creation Skills (Part 1)...Gov.

polifrog



I have been essentially disconnected from all media for the past week and a half and with the exception of a short visit to McDonald's represented by the post below polifrog has suffered. I considered an "on vacation" post but decided against telegraphing my absence to the unknown.

I'm back now and kinking off my return with what will likely become a reoccurring feature judging from history.

Via charlotteobserver.com :
Gov. Bev Perdue's office announced Wednesday that the company plans to create 100 new positions in North Carolina and will invest $36 million as part of the project, which was made possible in part by state grants from the Job Development Investment Grant program and One North Carolina Fund.
[emphasis mine]

Perhaps it would be cheaper to not drive perspective new corporations and their jobs from NC with an utter disrespect for property rights and contract law as Perdue has done in respect to Alcoa.

Although, claiming that which Perdue had no hand has a certain political luster.



out

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Bev Perdue Puts 60% of NC's Budget Off the Tablefor Cuts...

polifrog


According to WTVD on the staggering NC budget shortfall:

The cuts are expected to come from every corner of government.

However, the one area Perdue says she wants to protect is education despite it making up nearly 60 percent of the state budget.



So, education makes up 60% of the NC budget yet Perdue refuses cuts to education despite the obvious diminishing returns for every dollar spent.

Creating winners and losers with our tax dollars by forcing those areas of governance outside of education to shoulder the burden of the budget cuts will fail.




out

Saturday, December 11, 2010

Should Bev Perdue Resist the Tempatation of Listening to the Electorate On the NC Budget?

polifrog


On the Perdue budget:

Chris Fitzsimon, director of N.C. Policy Watch, in Perdue Must Resist Temptation to Shift to the Right argued that:

If Perdue proposes a budget that does not include a revenue increase, it reframes the debate and hands the Republicans a powerful rhetorical tool to pursue their agenda of shrinking government and slashing budgets of education and human services.


Would the Fitzsimon argue that what has become the often referenced "Clinton economic success" was in reality simply a shift to the right as a result of his advisers convincing him to listen to the electorate that had just installed the Gingrich 1994 congress -- in short, would Fitzsimon argue today that the Cinton response to the 1994 election was simply an unfortunate reframing of the debate?

Unlikely.



out

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Bev Perdue and a NC Budget Proposal...

polifrog



The NC budget deficit is growing. Is it $3.2 billion? $3.5?

A new report from the National Conference of State Legislatures on budget conditions in the 50 states and Puerto Rico puts the hole North Carolina is facing at more than $3.8 billion, or 20.3 percent of current budget. NCSL collected information for its report from legislative fiscal offices.

I guess a budget deficit of between 3 and 4 billion is close enough for government work; is it for you?

According to Bev Perdue the only course available to reduce the NC state budget deficit is "to focus on supporting mission critical services and eliminating programs that have outlived their usefulness."

BusinessWeek
[Bev Perdue's] administration directed agencies this week to offer ways to cut spending by up to 15 percent in the fiscal year starting next July 1.

...

In a memo dated Thursday to departments and agencies, State Budget Director Charlie Perusse asked for options on how they would cut 5 percent, 10 percent and 15 percent from their offices.

"Across-the-board reductions have already been taken," Perusse wrote. "This budget cycle we need to focus on supporting mission critical services and eliminating programs that have outlived their usefulness."

Targeted cuts as a method of lowering spending is a poor method for lowering budgets and is destined for failure. Targeted cuts impact recipients of state funds unequally. The result is the creation of haves and have-nots; those who bear the brunt of the cuts and those who do not. Further, those who bear the burden of the state budget cuts would rightfully respond to the unfairness of being singled out poorly and attempt to eliminate the budget cuts. In all likelihood the budget cuts would be severely reduced or eliminated altogether in an effort to draft a fairer budget to those who carry the burden of the cuts. The end result of Perdue's targeted budget cuts would be continued deficits resulting in a continuation of NC's dependence on conditional federal handouts.

NC's budget problems have become dire, so perhaps we should put the cart before the horse... and look back to our previous budget before going forward.

We can assume that a state budget once passed is essentially fair. If it were overly unfair in its distribution of state funds the budget would have failed until a fair budget were reached. This is the point at which the fair and equitable distribution of state funds can be found. It is also the point at which cuts should begin.

In keeping with the sense of fairness Americans are accustomed, the cuts should be made across the board so that all departments and all individuals carry the burden of the budget cuts. There would be no haves, just have-nots, each carrying a load lessoned by pervasiveness.

When departments complain of lowered funding, they can be reminded of their moral obligation to carry their share; they can be reminded that they are not alone in their burden.

It's not hard to be fair until you become a politician.






out

Friday, September 3, 2010

Did NC Gov. Bev Perdue Misallocate Funds in the NC Budget Two Months Ago?

polifrog


Under the administration of Bev Perdue the only course available to reduce the NC state budget deficit is "to focus on supporting mission critical services and eliminating programs that have outlived their usefulness."

BusinessWeek
[Bev Perdue's] administration directed agencies this week to offer ways to cut spending by up to 15 percent in the fiscal year starting next July 1.

...

In a memo dated Thursday to departments and agencies, State Budget Director Charlie Perusse asked for options on how they would cut 5 percent, 10 percent and 15 percent from their offices.

"Across-the-board reductions have already been taken," Perusse wrote. "This budget cycle we need to focus on supporting mission critical services and eliminating programs that have outlived their usefulness."

Targeted cuts as a method of lowering spending is a false argument designed with failure as an objective. It has at its presupposition that some services are more important than others, but it fails as an argument due to the fact that that presupposition was already accounted for in the prior year's budget.

We can assume that a state budget once passed is essentially fair. If it were overly unfair in its distribution of state funds the budget would have failed. For the Perdue administration to later claim that some services are "mission critical" while others are not is to claim misallocation of the funds within the previous budget -- in this case, a budget Governor Perdue signed into law just two months ago.

If we were to reject Bev Perdue's claim that her budget misallocated state funds and instead side with the belief that the budget passed just two months ago fairly distributed those funds, we could proceed to cut the budget fairly through a 15% (Bev Perdue's desired percentage) cut in funding to all recipients of state funding. All the recipients of NC state dollars would share the pain equally based on a budget passed just two months ago that fairly distributed state funds.

Governor Bev Perdue's administration, though, prefers targeted cuts that would impact recipients of state funds unequally. The result of this would be the creation of haves and have-nots; those who bear the brunt of the cuts and those who do not. Those who bear the burden of the state budget cuts would rightfully respond to the unfairness poorly and attempt to eliminate the budget cuts. In all likelihood the budgets would be severely reduced or eliminated altogether in an effort to draft a fairer budget. The end result of Perdue's targeted budget cuts is continued deficits and continued NC dependence on conditional federal handouts.

The following year the same arguments will be made and once again few if any budget cuts will result furthering NC dependence on the federal state dole.

One has to wonder if Bev Perdue truly desires to reduce the NC budget with her imposition of haves and have-nots.



out