Sunday, May 15, 2011
David Gregory of Meet the Press -- Racist...
Newt calls Obama "The Food-Stamp President" amid a massive increase in the food-stamp rolls while making no reference to race.
But David Gregory, viewing the world through his lens of race sees "coded racially tinged language" and accuses Newt of racism based only on his own presumption.
Who introduced race in this conversation? David Gregory.
When an individual presumptuously charges racism where there is none, the charge of racism becomes an act of racism itself.
David Gregory -- racist.
out
Thursday, May 12, 2011
Democrats Taxing Productivity While Letting the Wealthiest Slide...
Why are the wealthiest like Buffet and Gates liberals? Their politics runs counter to the democrat myth that republicans are the party of the rich.
The reason is simple.
Taxing income penalises the productive while sheltering the wealth of individuals like Buffet. That's right, the Democratic Party is the party of the non productive massively wealthy while rhetorically picking up the marginally more productive poor who have given up on high earnings.
Bruce Krasting:
When Obama talks of taxing millionaires and billionaires he is missing the mark. He is pushing for a higher tax on income. What he doesn’t get is that millionaires and billionaires actually don’t have that much income. Yes they have wealth, but it is very easy to avoid paying taxes on wealth. The people who will pay higher taxes are young people, not the rich old fogies that have bundles in the bank.
out
Baby Boomers, Hippies Gluttons all the Same...
Kenneth Anderson sitting in for Glen at Instapundit visits a theme I frequently pick low-hanging fruit from and hammers hippies:
Aging populations take less risk, innovate less, make fewer breakthroughs in new technology, consume more but not necessarily in ways that produce increases to the general standard of living. And when the aging generation has political power from numbers, they tend to think in terms of themselves – and call it social justice. Insofar as they have not produced lots of new children, they are less invested in the future after themselves, and are perfectly willing to eat the next generation’s seed corn.
Yep.
The Hippies are, and have been "The Man" for some time now. Our national debt problem is their pig, but they refuse responsibility for it. Firmly ensconced in moral relativism they selfishly support choice over life, they choose debt over thrift, they choose "The Man" over liberty, and they push poverty on all, but themselves.
The majority of the boomer generation could never stop thinking of themselves. First rejecting the thrift, success and sacrifice of the greatest generation then engorging themselves on a combination of free love, consumerism, and me-ism. Nothing satiated the boomer generation; not their incessant self aggrandizing through the media, not new age nonsense. They were lost in an endless maze of perpetual desire and unable to find contentment. Now with the bill for all their excess firmly on the table, they pass it on to subsequent generations. Once a hippie, now the man -- perpetually living off the plate of another.
Never before has our country seen such a worthless, selfish, shiftless, horrible, or gluttonous group of malcontents so intent on shifting their individual responsibility to society as the generation that followed the Greatest Generation.
They truly are --- The Worst Generation.
out
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
Love for the National Parks...
I feel love for our National Park system. I feel similarly for our highway system. Why? My feelings for the National Park System and our Highway system both stand in stark contrast to my generally libertarian sensibilities. Neither does the federal government have the authority from a Constitutional perspective to run either the parks or the highways yet despite this I feel no intrusion, no sense that these programs cross my individuality... why?
I believe the non controversial nature of these programs both personally and nationally stems from the fact that all citizens have equal access to them and that they constitute no transfer of wealth. No one is excluded and the parks and highways weigh upon us equally.
These programs unlike their more controversial wealth shifting siblings are egalitarian. In that respect I believe these programs should be a model for our failing controversial social programs.
out
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
1999 Toyota Sienna Wiper Repair...
Temporary Note for the month of October: If you find the post below useful please consider purchasing a round of popcorn from the link above for yourself , for the scouts and my son who's idea it was to put this on polifrog.
Thanks-----------------------------------------
Well, it was ignored until a couple of months ago when we were increasingly reduced to one wiper setting ... off.
The wiper motor seemed fine so I was initially interested in hunting down the only the control relay. As it turns out a little research lead me to conclude that the relay is integrated with the wiper motor itself. With that knowledge and after a visit to car-part.com a fifteen dollar replacement wiper motor was in hand.
I first ran it on intermittent. Note that the arm stops on the scribe:
I also ran it on low and high:
And finally tried it out on the van:
out
Monday, May 9, 2011
Rep. Brad Miller Rebuilding America in the wake of Environmentalism
More nonsense from Brad Miller ... Energy Critical Elements Renewal Act (Rep. Brad Miller, H.R. 952).
The skinny of a long post...
A) Radical environmentalists like Brad Miller helped to destroy the US rare earth mineral industry based on "environmental concerns".
B) The foreign supplies of the minerals from China are found to be an unreliable source.
C) The Fix: Restart the US rare earth mineral industry (for "environmental concerns") with the government's help and Brad Miller's support just days before the passage of ObamaCare.
According to Ben Goad of the Press-Enterprise...
After decades of production, the High Desert operation all but ceased operations amid environmental concerns in 2002. Since then, well over 90 percent of the world’s rare earths, as they are known in the industry, have come from China.
Ok, here is an example of the kind of environmentalism supported by Brad Miller that is complicit in shifting an entire industry and its jobs to China and has lead to a near world monopoly of rare earth minerals being produced in China.
a growth market is emerging for the elements, which are necessary to produce wind turbines. Many nations are now scrambling to develop renewable energy industries and China, chief among them, is expected to require a greater amount of its own supplies...
putting the US in a squeeze.
And, according to Mark Smith, Chief Executive of Molycorp Minerals..
The demand is going to outpace the supply.
Private funding proved difficult under the current economic conditions for the unprofitable Molycorp Minerals which, of course, led to lawmaker's dashing to the rescue and
during a congressional hearing last week, House members on both sides of the aisle spoke favorably about the push to ramp up operations at the Mountain Pass Mine, with one of them introducing a bill that could help yield funding for the $450 million plan.
Brad Miller, supporter of environmental causes great and small, had this to say...
During a hearing March 16 before the House subcommittee on Science and Technology, the push for federal assistance gained more traction when the panel's chairman, Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., described Smith's operation as vital in reducing dependence on the Chinese.
"If we intend to rebuild America's capability to supply its own needs in rare earth materials, if we intend to foster a home-grown capability to make the devices that provide wind energy, we can't succeed unless he and others like him succeed," Miller said. (emphasis added)
Ben Goad adds...
Separately, Rep. Mike Coffman, D-Colo., the following day introduced legislation that would make Molycorp's plan eligible for the loan guarantee program, which would allow the company to borrow 70 percent of the $450 million cost, to be paid back over 10 years, Smith said.
Also according to the article..
The operation would create about 900 permanent jobs and about 700 temporary jobs related to the estimated 22-month construction period, Smith said.
He said Molycorp would draw most of the workers from Inland Southern California and the Henderson-Las Vegas region of Nevada.
To sum up...
The environmentalists, supported by Brad Miller, helped to destroy the production of rare earth minerals for "environmental reasons". Later it is realized that the industry is useful for "environmental reasons" and that it is in the interest of national security to have the industry within our boarders, as China had become the supplier of 90% of rare earth minerals. Realizing this, our representatives meet in the days leading up to the passing of ObamaCare to devise legislation creating a 450 million dollar loan to the unprofitable LLC Mollycorp Minerals.
Winners...
--Mollycorp Minerals.
--Representative Mike Coffman (R-CO) out which state Mollycorp Minerals is based.
--Harry Reid's Nevada and the representatives of the eastern districts of Southern California as they can claim the creation of around 1500 jobs originally destroyed by the environmental movement.
--The nearly 1500 Employees who get their jobs returned to them for "environmental reasons" after loosing them for "environmental reasons".
--StatistsLosers...
--The American society, and the American economy over the long run,
--The employees who lost work due to the environmental movement in the first place,
--Brad Miller, who seems clueless to the irony of supporting the economically destructive activities of environmentalism, and then later coming to the support of rebuilding the devastation left by environmentalism.
Governments can make inefficient choices and governing the destruction of economic activity only to manipulate its reconstruction to the credit of our representatives is one of them.
out
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Isn't This How the Civil War Began?
Via Cafe Hayek:
Here’s a letter to the Wall Street Journal:
The National Labor Relations Board is trying to stop Boeing from moving the production of some of its jetliners from Washington state to South Carolina where less-burdensome labor-union privileges will allow Boeing to produce at lower cost (Letters, May 7). One unintended by-product of Boeing’s move, of course, would be greater competition for workers in the south and, hence, rising wages there.
Uncle Sam’s willingness to deploy brute force to prevent the movement of industries to the lower-cost American south isn’t new. The most notorious instance of this nasty habit occurred in 1938 when, to strip away the cost advantage enjoyed by their rivals in lower-wage Georgia and the Carolinas, owners of textile mills in New England successfully lobbied Congress and FDR to enact America’s first national minimum-wage statute.
Then as now, Uncle Sam – despite all his blah, blah, blah about ‘justice’ and being on the side of ‘working families’ – kept the wages of higher-paid Americans artificially high by keeping the wages of lower-paid Americans artificially low.
Sincerely,
Donald J. Boudreaux
Labor screwing the poor.
out
Sowing the Seeds of Doubt...
Frankly, if the media were on the trail of Exxon or the Bush Administration there would be no end to the questions over the curious double and triple shuffling of the events surrounding the Osama Operation.
Commenter JJ Bookworm Room:
1) There was a firefight.
2) There was no firefight.
3) Bin Laden was “resisting.”
4) Bin Laden wasn’t armed. (Makes the concept of “resisting” interesting.)
5) He used his wife as a shield.
6) His wife was killed too.
7) He didn’t use his wife as a shield, she ran at a SEAL who shot her in the leg, but she’s fine.
Some other woman – the maid? – was used as a shield. By somebody. Downstairs.
9) That other woman – downstairs – was killed.
10) Maybe not. She was killed unless she wasn’t – and who was she, anyway?
11) Bin Laden’s son was killed.
12) Unless it was some other guy.
13) Bin Laden’s daughter saw him get killed. She’s undoubtedly traumatized, poor dear.
14) They were going to capture Bin Laden until the problem with the helicopter, which was:
A) It had mechanical trouble
B) It did a hard landing
C) It crashed
D) It clipped a wall with a tail rotor, effectively a crash
15.) They were never going to try to capture him, it was always a kill mission.
16.) No it wasn’t.
17) The chopper blew up.
18) The SEALs blew it up.
19.) Panetta said yesterday the world needed proof, the photo would be released.
20.) Obama said today in an interview he taped with Steve Kroft for “60 Minutes” to be broadcast Sunday that it won’t be released. It’s too gruesome, would offend Muslim sensibilities (something he worries about a lot – I personally do not give a warm fart on a wet Wednesday about Muslim sensibilities), and how would Americans feel if Muslims released pictures of dead Americans?
21.) Kroft – whose not a total idiot – pointed out that ever since “Black Hawk Down” days, Muslims have been doing precisely that, filming American bodies being dragged through the streets, filming Daniel Pearl’s head being cut off, filming any and everything.
22) Obama gets pissed at CBS, the tape gets cleaned up, that question disappears. (Inside info.)
23.) We got a “treasure trove” of stuff from hard drives, etc.
24.) There were no phone lines, and no internet access at the “mansion,” they didn’t even have TV – what “treasure trove?”
25.) There is obviously in the pictures of the place a large satellite dish. I guess they used it for making salads.
26.) And now, just today: apparently the idea was to capture him, but only if he was naked. There was a suspicion he might be wearing a suicide bomber type explosive vest, or belt. So if he’s not naked and you can’t see if he has a vest on or not – shoot him.
out
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Redistricting in NC. ..
Three new conservative districts may be created by way of creating a second Mel Watt, thus likely forcing Miller and Kissell into less cushy districts.
Rep. Patrick McHenry via NewsObserver:
"Republicans should pick up three seats under any fair and legal map," he continued. "That is huge. No other states in the nation would gain as many Republican seats. Clearly, Reps. (Larry) Kissell and (Brad) Miller are serving their final term."
Don't like these results? Put blame on the Voting Rights Act as it trumps the NC Constitution's anti gerrymandering measures.
out
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Osama bin Laden Codename -- Racist...
Rockingham NC GOP Monthly Breakfast - This Saturday...
Via Steve Herr:
We will have our monthly Breakfast on May 7th at the
Wray Center
432 Bridge St.,
Eden. NC.
Breakfast is from 8 a.m to 9 a.m. Hear from our
Representatives and enjoy general discussion on political matters at 9 a.m.
out
We know Who's in Charge, But Who Runs the White House?
White House Insider:
I was told – in these exact terms, “we overruled him.” (Obama) I have since followed up and received further details on exactly what that meant, as well as the specifics of how Leon Panetta worked around the president’s “persistent hesitation to act.” There appears NOT to have been an outright overruling of any specific position by President Obama, simply because there was no specific position from the president to do so. President Obama was, in this case, as in all others, working as an absentee president.
and
President Obama was literally pulled from a golf outing and escorted back to the White House to be informed of the mission. Upon his arrival there was a briefing held which included Bill Daley, John Brennan, and a high ranking member of the military. When Obama emerged from the briefing, he was described as looking “very confused and uncertain.” The president was then placed in the situation room where several of the players in this event had already been watching the operation unfold. Another interesting tidbit regarding this is that the Vice President was already “up to speed” on the operation. A source indicated they believe Hillary Clinton had personally made certain the Vice President was made aware of that day’s events before the president was. The now famous photo released shows the particulars of that of that room and its occupants. What that photo does not communicate directly is that the military personnel present in that room during the operation unfolding, deferred to either Hillary Clinton or Robert Gates. The president’s role was minimal, including their acknowledging of his presence in the room.
H/T Maggie's Farm...
This interview has the ring of truth except for the plethera of information from a single source.
out
Obama: No Photo of Osama...
I assume some form of proof is forth coming.
Without proof of Osama's death Obama will have, within the span of a week, simply replaced Birtherism with something similar and new...(Binners?)
Update:
Leon Panetta says ... yes,
Obama says ... no,
Reuters says here are some pics.
I wonder who's in charge...
[edited for clarity]
out
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Banking Theft By, For and Of the People...
The financial industry needs a haircut and it would have happened naturally had the government not supported the result of their gamesmanship with more government sanctioned theft through TARP and the Federal Reserve.
We the people pay the price.
Charlie Munger, Vice-Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway:
out
It Seems NC Need Not Worry About Hydraulic Fracturing -- The EPA May Soon be on the Case..
Pundit Press:
Last week, while everyone else was talking about the President's long form birth certificate, the EPA was busy releasing new regulations designed to choke off any nascent economic growth that may help to lift the nation out of the great recession.And from the same article:
The suit seems rather specious from the get go as a full study was conducted and completed in 2004 and concluded in its executive summary that injection of hydraulic fracturing fluids "poses little or no threat to underground sources of drinking water (USDWs) and does not justify additional study at this time." But hey, that was 6 years ago!
out
A Couple of Thoughts on Osama's Burial at Sea...
On Facebook, Michael Yon writes:
“Major mistake. OBL was/is a powerful cult figure who has vanished with no ‘death certificate.’ His body should have been displayed. The only thing more powerful than a living cult leader is one who disappears off the face of the earth. Making his body disappear was a deadly blunder that plays straight into the hero myth. Joseph Campbell couldn’t have written a more terrible ending.”
Rand Simberg:
It has been reported that after Osama bin Laden was dispatched yesterday, he was given a burial at sea, in the “Islamic practice”: In accordance with Islamic practice, bin Laden was washed and wrapped in a white sheet before buried at sea at 2 a.m. local time, senior U.S. military and intelligence officials said.
This was presumably done in the interest of impressing the “moderate” Muslims of the world with our respect for their religion, but if anything, it does just the opposite. What we were unwittingly implying by that politically correct act was that we agree with those who claim that Osama was a true Muslim, and that we don’t accept the account of the reformers that he was an apostate. What are the latter to make of it? And how does this in any way discourage his supporters, knowing that when we dispatch them to get their virgins (or raisins, or whatever) we will take pains to ensure their safe arrival in heaven?
out
Sunday, May 1, 2011
OBL RIP...
This has been claimed before...
Waiting
Drudge claims shot in head by CIA.
Update:
Yahoo:
Two senior counterterrorism officials confirmed that bin Laden was killed in Pakistan last week. One said bin Laden was killed in a ground operation, not by a Predator drone. Both said the operation was based on U.S. intelligence, and both said the U.S. is in possession of bin Laden's body.
Officials long believed bin Laden, the most wanted man in the world, was hiding a mountainous region along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border.
The officials spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to speak ahead of the president.
out
What if 3/4 of the US Felt Government Overspends...
Another Non-Keynesian Reality...
Gallup:
The large majority of Americans say spending too much money on unneeded or wasteful federal programs is to blame for the federal budget deficit, while 22% say the deficit is a consequence of not raising enough in taxes to pay for needed programs.
out

